Live CoveragePresented by 
Armstrong on Oprah, Night 2
Our editors and special guests discuss the legal, PR and sporting ramifications of Lance Armstrong's OWN appearance, as well as the historical context of the Texan's career. Editor-in-chief Neal Rogers and VeloNews.com editor Brian Holcombe anchor the conversation and will be joined by reporter Matthew Beaudin, contributors Dan Wuori, Mark Johnson and Ryan Newill, and others.
-


Good evening and welcome to VeloNews.com's live analysis coverage of the second night of Lance Armstrong's confessional with Oprah Winfrey. To say we were surprised with the way night 1 opened would be an understatement. At the same time, many questions remain, Armstrong remained defiant on a number of key issues, and a 90-minute program lies ahead.
You can catch up on our coverage of last night's broadcast here: live.velonews.com
Editor-in-chief Neal Rogers will anchor our coverage tonight. He has covered Armstrong for a decade and wrote last night about his impressions of the interview. Read them here: velonews.competitor.com
Here's a shot of Neal's "Lance on Oprah" workstation, with a sneak preview of the March issue of Velo magazine with coverboy Peter Sagan. pbs.twimg.com/media/BA7zGuXCcAAsyPT.jpgby Neal Rogers via twitter edited by Brian Holcombe 1/19/2013 1:09:43 AM -
Lance and Oprah should be good tonight. The season finale always has a cliffhanger.by dwuori via twitter 1/19/2013 1:16:27 AM -

-

-


For those who asked: BingoStrong pbs.twimg.com/media/BA2hPs5CYAAsJwq.jpg
by Neal Rogers via twitter 1/19/2013 1:20:14 AM -


For those who asked: Armstrong/Oprah drinking game pbs.twimg.com/media/BA2hhglCUAArRkw.jpg
by Neal Rogers via twitter 1/19/2013 1:21:00 AM -
Last night's admission to Oprah reminded me, very much, of this August 2010 story from The Onion: "Lance Armstrong Wants To Tell Nation Something But Nation Has To Promise Not To Get Mad"
www.theonion.com -

-

-

-

-
I've spent the last hour watching a replay of last night's broadcast. The more I watch it, the more obvious it is how guarded, calculated and insincere Armstrong was. 24 hours ago, I was interested, curious and anxious. After Armstrong's "performance" last night, I'm just cynical, disappointed and anxious. -

-

-

-
If the Government proceeds with the False Claims Act/Qui Tam action that Floyd Landis has initiated for recovery of the $32 Million that USPS paid in sponsorship fees, Landis will get between 15 and 25 percent of any recovery. If the Government declines to proceed and Landis litigates, he will get between 25 and 30 percent of any recovery. The recovery percentages are in the False Claims Act and were increased by Congress in 1986 to encourage whistleblowers to expose fraud. Whether Landis would recover at the lower end or the higher end of the range would depend upon a number of factors. For example: The facts that Landis participated in the fraud against the Government and delayed in reporting it would support a lower award; if he contributed substantial information and provided substantial assistance with respect to the case, it would support a higher award. -

-

-

-
The big take away I have from last night is that Lance really doesn't have any remorse for what he did, other than attempting the comeback. As he said, if he hadn't attempted a comeback he wouldn't be on the couch opposite Oprah. He's only admitting it now as an attempt to rehabilitate his image and have the (American) public embrace him as a "flawed human being", and in so doing make his "mythology" once more a redemptive narrative. It strikes me as terribly calculating and cynical. -

-

-

-
Day 1 was a start for Armstrong but I think today's reaction by public and press highlighted what a steep hill he has to climb. He seemed strong on the admission but weaker on the remorse. In In crisis communications, we talk about the four-point apology. LA effectively completed step one (admit the mistake), but failed at steps two (express remorse), three (acknowledge harm) and four (offer a plan to repair the damage). Perhaps those will come this evening. -

-

-

-

-

-

-

-
Here's that day the sponsors left, October 17, at VeloNews.com: velonews.competitor.com -

-

-

-

-

-
Branding experts told us that that single day was the most precipitous decline in an athletic icon's value in U.S. history: velonews.competitor.com -

-

-

-

-

-

-



